<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ben Bernanke &#8211; Sackless Wonder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brunoandtheprofessor.com/2007/08/ben_bernanke_-_sackless.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brunoandtheprofessor.com/2007/08/ben_bernanke_-_sackless.php</link>
	<description>Bruno and the Professor is a progressive, liberal weekly talk radio podcast covering issues from Seattle, the United States, and the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 03:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.brunoandtheprofessor.com/2007/08/ben_bernanke_-_sackless.php/comment-page-1#comment-5342</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunoandtheprofessor.com/2007/08/ben_bernanke_-_sackless.php#comment-5342</guid>
		<description>Krugman has a nice compromise in his &lt;a href=&quot;http://select.nytimes.com/2007/08/17/opinion/17krugman.html?&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;op-ed&lt;/a&gt; today.  He says that it used to be the case that the bank would re-negotiate the terms with the borrower in order to prevent foreclosure, which was a hassle for both parties.  But they can&#039;t do that anymore, b/c the mortgage has been packaged and sold off.   So he suggests:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The mechanics of a domestic version would need a lot of work, from lawyers as well as financial experts. My guess is that it would involve federal agencies buying mortgages — not the securities conjured up from these mortgages, but the original loans — at a steep discount, then renegotiating the terms. But I’m happy to listen to better ideas.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krugman has a nice compromise in his <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2007/08/17/opinion/17krugman.html?" rel="nofollow">op-ed</a> today.  He says that it used to be the case that the bank would re-negotiate the terms with the borrower in order to prevent foreclosure, which was a hassle for both parties.  But they can&#8217;t do that anymore, b/c the mortgage has been packaged and sold off.   So he suggests:</p>
<blockquote><p>The mechanics of a domestic version would need a lot of work, from lawyers as well as financial experts. My guess is that it would involve federal agencies buying mortgages — not the securities conjured up from these mortgages, but the original loans — at a steep discount, then renegotiating the terms. But I’m happy to listen to better ideas.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
