<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Liberals are Better at Fighting Terror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brunoandtheprofessor.com/2004/08/why_liberals_ar.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brunoandtheprofessor.com/2004/08/why_liberals_ar.php</link>
	<description>Bruno and the Professor is a progressive, liberal weekly talk radio podcast covering issues from Seattle, the United States, and the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMW</title>
		<link>http://www.brunoandtheprofessor.com/2004/08/why_liberals_ar.php/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>RMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.brunoandtheprofessor.com/2004/08/why-liberals-are-better-at-fighting-terror.php#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think he had a lot to fight for because the issue is that he put his lover on the payroll. He&#039;s not a pansy for folding, he just knew when to call it a day. Ethically speaking he doesn&#039;t have a leg to stand on. I mean, come on, he was cheating on his wife and got his lover a gig for 100k a year.

This isn&#039;t about being gay, it&#039;s about him putting his lover on the payroll. At least Lewinski was an intern.

With how hyper the republicans are about bashing the dem&#039;s I have a feeling that the republicans would be just as happy to jump on this if his lover were a woman. 

It&#039;s just Derbyshire then wouldn&#039;t be able to make his little &quot;eiuw&quot; comment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think he had a lot to fight for because the issue is that he put his lover on the payroll. He&#8217;s not a pansy for folding, he just knew when to call it a day. Ethically speaking he doesn&#8217;t have a leg to stand on. I mean, come on, he was cheating on his wife and got his lover a gig for 100k a year.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t about being gay, it&#8217;s about him putting his lover on the payroll. At least Lewinski was an intern.</p>
<p>With how hyper the republicans are about bashing the dem&#8217;s I have a feeling that the republicans would be just as happy to jump on this if his lover were a woman. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just Derbyshire then wouldn&#8217;t be able to make his little &#8220;eiuw&#8221; comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

