What I’m About


Posted by Matski on August 23rd, 2004

Hi folks,

As you know, Bruno and I are out not just to take the country back from the Morlocks, but to reenvision the future in a way the is meaningful, progressive, and achievable. Here’s a piece I wrote about my political views a while back.

Thought some of you might find it interesting.

Matski

_____________________

I am a bombastic neo-liberal not afraid to take cheap shots against both left and right. The core of my liberalism is my belief that government has only two proper purposes: (1) To correct market failure and (2) To enforce contracts, including social contracts. In this I see myself the heir to Bentham, Mill, and their ilk. My own twist on this classicism is that I believe that MARKETS ARE SOCIAL CREATIONS, and, therefore, government has the right and responsibility to regulate them in whatever way it sees fit, given sufficient provisions for efficiency concerns, etc.

I’m very Rawlsian in my belief that the biggest challenge for us in America is to ensure equality of opportunity (inequality of opportunity being an example of market failure), and that makes me very pro-education, pro-transit, pro-universal healthcare, pro-development.

I’m anti-command-and-control, but pro-incentivization. You’ll never convince me that globalization is anything but good in its outcomes, if not always in its means. And progress is a fact that we must accept and deal with. The challenge is not to stop progress, but to manage it in such a way that we can live with its bad side (the chip in my neck is coming, like it or not – do I fight it and let Ashcroft decide how the system is set up, or do I recognize the inevitability of the thing and work to ensure that I can live with what happens?).

I believe that there are certain inalienable truths about human nature, which too many liberals ignore. Peaceful utopia is only possible with complete and perfect free love and absolutely no resource scarcity, but that’s not going to happen in my lifetime, so we must seek to channel the more aggressive aspects of human nature to more productive, or, at least, less destructive purposes. This is why I support both the continued manned exploration of space and the furtherment of sports.

I have some atypical views, for a liberal. Unions can be a force for great good, but too often are the willing (if unconsciously so) partners to large corporations hell-bent on improving the bottom line (unions help the most skilled, most employable workers most … or, in the case of the teachers unions, create an intolerable situation where we’d love to pay the position itself more, but can’t possibly stomach paying many of the individuals who hold the position more). I’m for the abolition of affirmative action based on race (if we continue to have a legal definition of – and benefit for – racial separatism, then we will always have a group defined as “the other,” c.f. Hannah Arendt’s discussion of “The Origins of Totalitarianism” for a rationale as to why this is bad) and I also find myself being more and more pro-gun (else, who will fight for the left in the inevitable kulturkampf?).

One more thing: I hope never to let my strong and deeply held opinions get in the way of my right and responsibility to learn and to change my mind when I’m proven wrong. I expect regularly to eat crow, and – in the context of my responsibility to the program – seek only to do so in an entertaining fashion.


No Responses to “What I’m About”  

  1. 1 Jay

    Nothing to do with Katherine Harris, but since I don’t know how to start my own thread on this site, I figured I would add my two cents here.

    I read a lot about how much Bruno and Matski hate Ann Coulter, and I think much of it is true. However, can you tell me that anything in the following link is not inflammatory:

    http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0818-11.htm

    Now I don’t know who Ted Rall is, and maybe he is considered a kook within the real progressive community, but I was deeply offended by his article.

    How can he call the locations at Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib concentration camps? These were not people who were rounded up in the streets of New York and Seattle (as Jews were rounded up in the streets of Warsaw and Paris). These were men who attacked U.S. military of their own accord. And they were not subjected to slave labor or starved or burned alive. They were given three meals a day, pointed the way towards Mecca, had Amnesty International watching over them (at Guantanamo), and in the worst abuses in Abu Ghraib, were stripped naked and photographed (and only months later are the soldiers responsible being tried).

    I can’t say I want the GOP convention in New York, but that is mostly because of the expected onslaught of aggressors such as Ted Rall. My message to would-be protesters: Don’t come. You are not helping your country by yelling at officials who cannot hear you through the 10 ft thick walls of MSG, and you are only hurting the financial engine of the United States (if you think I am wrong, check out any U.S. tax form listing New York City as the top per capita contributor to federal tax coffers, and among the bottom of per capita beneficiaries of federal tax dollars).

    Instead, focus your energies on making a difference. It is al well and good to complain and point out the faults of the ruling party. Instead of offering up limp candidates (Gore, Kerry), provide leadership with new solutions, not new problems. I will vote for that person.

  2. 2 Bruno

    Yep, Ted Rall is a jerk-off. I won’t defend him. Thanks for the comments, Jay.

  3. 3 Bruno

    This is Ted Rall:

    http://www.ucomics.com/rallcom/2004/05/03/

    Jeebus.

  4. 4 Jay

    Wow, what an a-hole.


Now Playing: Episode 360

 
 Standard Podcast [31:54m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Biden and Palin square off while international intrigue heats up in Africa and the Middle East.

Links Mentioned: AfricomFrank Rich on Palin …